Sermon
THE RISEN LORD
Bath 10-21-01
Isaiah 43:1-13 Hymns: 312
Luke 24:36-52 *34
Responsive Reading #25. pp. 153f. 316
True Christianity 3
I came out from the Father and have come into the world; I am leaving the
world and going back to the Father.
John 16:28
This is the fourth in the series of efforts to put the basic tenets of our
faith into brief and simple statements, and each such effort will begin
with a list of the previous statements, on the time-tested theory that
repetition can be an aid to learning. The first three statements, then,
were "There is no wrath of God," "The Lord is good to all," and "The Lord
our God is one." This morning we focus again on the Lord with the
statement, "We worship the risen Lord."
In Convention's 1950 Book of Worship, the statement of faith in the First
Order of Service is entitled, "The Adoramus: Our Faith in the Glorified
Lord." "Adoramus" is Latin for the opening words of the statement, "We
worship," and the words "glorified Lord" are intended to rule out two
common misconceptions. First of all, the word "glorified" is reminding us
that we do not worship Jesus of Nazareth. The word "Lord" reminds us that
we do not worship an infinite and unknowable "Father," either. This
morning, I should like," and then look at what these two "exclusions" imply
for our understanding of ourselves, our relationship to the Lord, and our
relationships to each other.
It may help to begin with some church history. Our own churches have never
made much use of the cross as a symbol of our faith. In this respect, we
are in a sense returning to the practice of the apostolic church. As I have
mentioned several times before, there is evidence in the Book of Acts that
the apostles did not go forth with the message that Jesus had died for our
sins, which is often the message of the cross, but with the message that
Jesus had risen from the dead. They saw themselves called to be witnesses
to the resurrection (see Acts 1:22). A brief description of the early
church is offered in Acts 4:32f.:
Now the whole group of those who believed were of one heart and soul, and
no one claimed private ownership of any possessions, but everything they
owned was held in common. With great power the apostles gave their
testimony to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus, and great grace was upon
them all.
Paul put more emphasis on the crucifixion, but primarily as a model for the
Christian: "We know that our old self was crucified with him so that the
body of sin might be destroyed and we might no longer be enslaved to sin.
For whoever has died is freed from sin" (Romans 6:6f.). But Paul goes on
even here to point beyond the crucifixion: "But if we have died with
Christ, we believe that we will also live with him" (Romans 6:8). In other
words, far from saying that Christ has died for our sins, Paul is saying
that we ourselves must die for them.
The cross moved to the center of Christian symbolism with the reign of
Constantine in the fourth century, and this was part of an immense change
in the nature and activity of the church. It was with Constantine that
Christianity suddenly ceased to be an outlaw religion, subject to
unpredictable spasms of persecution, and became the official religion of
the Roman empire; and the symbol of the cross is very much involved in this
change. The fourth-century historian Eusebius (who was particularly
concerned to present Constantine in the most favorable light possible)
described a vision that Constantine had seen on the evening of a battle:
"He saw with his own eyes the trophy of a cross of light in the heavens,
above the sun, and bearing the inscription, `CONQUER BY THIS.'" The symbol
of his army? "A long spear overlaid with gold, formed the figure of the
cross by means of a transverse bar laid over it" (James Carroll,
Constantine's Sword: The Church and the Jews [Boston: Houghton Mifflin,
2001]. p. 175).
Small wonder that the symbol of the cross was dreaded by the enemies of the
Roman empire and especially by Jews, who found themselves increasingly
persecuted because of their supposed role in the crucifixion. By the
eleventh century, the cross became the symbol of the Crusader-the word
"crusade" is derived from the word for "cross"-and led the Christian armies
in their bloody wars against the Muslims who lived in the Holy Land. Small
wonder that President Bush's use of the word "crusade" roused violent
reactions.
Much of that history has been forgotten by us and by many Christians, of
course. The cross can be found in some of our own most traditional
churches, primarily to convey the message that we are indeed a Christian
church. It is sad indeed that even this title, even the name "Christian,"
is so commonly associated with an insistence that only Christians are
saved, and all too often with outright bigotry; but in a way, the seeds of
that distortion were planted back in the fourth century, with the adoption
of the cross as a symbol of military conquest.
The return to a focus on the resurrection is significant. It does not mean
a denial of the crucifixion, since the disaster of the crucifixion was the
necessary prelude to the triumph of the resurrection. It may be then
appropriate to have the empty cross as a symbol, the cross reminding us of
the death and the emptiness testifying to the victory of life. Still, it
seems clear that the most appropriate symbol of our faith, if we can call
it that, is the figure of the Lord as risen and glorified. This is why two
of our orders of service begin with that image, one from the story of the
transfiguration and one from the vision of John that introduces the Book of
Revelation.
The resurrection, I would suggest, is what makes sense out of everything
else. The figure of Jesus of Nazareth is enigmatic-sometimes radiant,
transfigured, and sometimes bereft, feeling himself forsaken by his God. We
can identify with this figure to some extent because of our own highs and
lows, but what is worthy of our worship is the source of the highs. It is
important to remember that we do not worship the human Jesus of Nazareth,
but equally important to see in that human figure the workings of divinity.
It is the Father within who is doing the works, the Father who is beyond
our sight, beyond our comprehension. Things are not completely sorted out
until the resurrection. Then the inner nature has, so to speak, filled
every least crevice of the outer. Then all the weakness has been filled
with strength and all the doubt with certainty. This is not infinite Deity,
but it is the face of infinite Deity, "for in him the whole fullness of
deity dwells embodied" (Colossians 2:9).
There is a most marvelous paradox here. Nothing is more mysterious, more
impossible to comprehend, than the intersection of the infinite and the
finite, of divinity and humanity, and yet nothing, nothing whatever, is
more common. At this moment and at every moment of our lives, we live
because the Lord's life is flowing into us. We feel because of the inflow
of the Lord's love, we think and perceive because of the inflow of the
Lord's wisdom, we act because of the inflow of the Lord's strength. The
very experience we have of being independent creatures is a gift, something
we are granted from moment to moment.
One of the Lord's parables points to that presence with particular clarity.
It is the parable of the sheep and the goats in the twenty-fifth chapter of
Matthew, and the particular statements that carry this message are "Just as
you did it to one of the least of these who are members of my family, you
did it to me," and "Just as you did not do it on one of the least of these,
you did not do it to me." We are dealing with the Lord in everyone we meet
because everyone we meet is being sustained in life by the same love and
wisdom that are flowing into us. Everyone else embodies this same paradox,
the same intersection between humanity and divinity, that is infinitely
present in the incarnation and that is resolved in the resurrection.
Making the resurrection central, then, focusing our worship on the risen
Lord, is focusing our attention on the promise of life and not simply on
its difficulties and dangers. It is reminding us that the Lord has designed
each one of us for angelhood, for a brilliance and beauty that we can
scarcely comprehend. This is true of men and women, rich and poor, literate
and illiterate, Christians and Muslims-there are no exceptions. The
apparent exceptions, the people who are deliberately malevolent or cruel or
licentious or grasping, are not exceptions but tragedies.
Once we focus on the resurrection for which we have been created, even the
crucifixion fits the picture. Quite literally, we have caught a glimpse
"something to die for." This is what the Lord's parables of the pearl of
great price and the treasure hidden in the field are trying to tell us; and
the Lord's life among us shows us what is involved in this dying. It is not
just enduring through one last moment of agony. It is the daily laying down
of our lives for those around us. Day after day he gave his attention to
the people he had come to save, and without that foundation of self-giving,
the self-giving on the cross would never have happened.
To love each other as he has loved us, then, means finding daily
self-forgetfulness in words and deeds of caring. It means noticing our
tendencies to self-importance whenever they surface and turning away from
them. It means spending less time imagining what other people could or
should do to make our lives more comfortable and more time trying to
discover what we can do, less time wishing they would change and more time
wishing we would change.
We can hardly expect ourselves to do this if all we can see is the
sacrifice involved, if we cannot see beyond the cross. That is the culture
in which martyr complexes are bred, the fertile ground of self-pity.
Wherever the spirit shines through the letter of Scripture we are called to
"choose life" rather than death. We are called, that is, to be witnesses to
the resurrection not simply by talking about it but by living it. We are
called to a joy that comes only when divinity and humanity meet, to a
community filled with the presence of the glorified Lord.
Amen.
1
True Christianity 3
In its specific form, the faith of the new heaven and the new church is as
follows. Jehovah God is love itself and wisdom itself, or the good itself
and the true itself. He came down as divine truth, which is the Word and
was "God with God", and took on our human nature with a view to bringing
everything in heaven, everything in hell, and everything in the church back
into its intended design. He did this because at that time the power of
hell was stronger than the power of heaven, and on earth the power of evil
stronger than the power of good, so that utter damnation was standing at
the gates and threatening us. Jehovah God lifted this impending damnation
by means of his human nature, which was divine truth, and by doing so
redeemed both angels and humans. Then he united divine truth with divine
good in his human nature and thereby returned to the divine nature he had
had from eternity, together with and within his glorified human nature.
2